Connect with us

Club Selection

Golficity Data Dive – Approach Shots from Outside 100 Yards

mm

Published

on

This article is another installment in the Golficity Data Dive series, which is based on Shot Scope data analyzing more than 18 million shots recorded on more than 40,000 courses around the world.  Armed with an abundance of data from amateurs golfers of all different skill levels, Shot Scope has identified some trends and patterns that higher handicap golfers often fall victim to and, with a few simple strategy changes, can help them play better, score lower and, as a result, have more fun while out on the course.

Matthew Wolff’s win at the 3M Open in Minnesota has garnered lots of attention. While Wolff’s incredibly unique swing and winning, 26-foot eagle putt have been the primary takeaways, one of the main factors that led to Wolff’s victory was his strokes gained (SG) approach performance (i.e., shots that are not from the tee on par-4 and par-5 holes, around-the-green or putts).

Embed from Getty Images

This is largely because, in contrast to most amateur golfers, the pros know exactly how far their iron shots go with full swings, ¾ swings, half-swings, etc.

In this regard, one of Shot Scope’s invaluable features is that it provides users with their true, GPS-tracked club distances, which can then be used to help make better decisions and, ultimately, shoot better scores.

Knowing your distances is particularly important in light of the fact that Shot Scope data reveals that 72% of danger is at the front of the green (usually a sand bunker or water hazard), whereas there’s only 28% at the back.

Simply put, missing long is often significantly less dangerous than missing short.

Using the club distances and hole pictured above, if this golfer were to hit their 8 iron (which, when well struck, should put them in the middle of the green), his distance average and performance average show that he would likely end up in the danger zone at the front of the green. Accordingly, the same golfer would benefit from playing a 7 or 6 iron and eliminate the chance of landing in the danger.

Want another reason why clubbing up is probably a good idea: Greens In Regulation

For those unfamiliar, a “GIR” is achieved when the ball rests on the putting surface and the number of strokes taken is at least two fewer than par (i.e., by the first stroke on a par 3, the second stroke on a par 4, or the third stroke on a par 5). 

Notably, GIR is, arguably, the most important stat for lowering your score.

Indeed, Shot Scope data reveals a significant decrease in GIR percentage between an 8 and a 14 handicapper largely due to the fact that a 14 handicapper generally doesn’t hit it quite as far and can’t reach some holes in regulation. 

In contrast, the 8 handicapper, generally, hits it further and more effectively manages their club distances, thereby resulting in a much higher GIR percentage.

In sum, if you happen to be struggling with your approach shots from over 100 yards and are committed to lowering your scores, considering taking one more club than you think you need (except for those holes where the real trouble is behind the green). 

While it’s certainly going to be a little humbling at first to put your 8 iron back in the bag and, instead, go with the 7 iron, by including a little extra cushion for error, you’ll likely find yourself on the green (and achieving more GIRs) or, in the worst case, in a safer place that should present an easier up-and-down opportunity.


Player data and graphics courtesy of Shot Scope

Ever since golf became a competitive outlet, nothing brings Eric more joy than a well struck 4 iron. And despite living in NYC, Eric makes it a priority to work on his game and fitness during the week, along with a round or two over the weekend. Fortunately, he’s got a very understanding fiancé who (for the time being) accepts him and his obsession. Follow Eric on IG @hozel_rocket.

Click to comment
0 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x